Coming on the heels of the Benazir Bhutto assassination, there are a few making claims that the US should have done more to prevent the bombing, or at the very least, offer more guidance on how Bhutto should have been protected.
At first glance, its sounds pretty absurd, doesn’t it? The US is to blame because a foreign leader is killed on foriegn soil? A deeper look reveals a shadier underbelly that most Americans would rather not admit.
Americans don’t settle for the peace loving type of presidents. You remember the kid on the playground that stole your lunch money and threatened to pop you in the face if you told anyone? That’s how we like our presidents and we’ve been voting for these types since time began. The only exception, in my mind, being Jimmy Carter, and let’s face it, the republicans really had no shot in that election.
People fancy that John F. Kennedy would have removed us from Viet-nam. Only with perspective do we think getting out of Viet-nam was a good idea. Any attempt to de-escalate that war would have painted Kennedy or Johnson as soft on communism, setting the stage for exactly what we got in 1968, a Nixon presidency.
Liberals have been branded as big spenders and rightly so. But the conservatives are every bit as big of a spender as any liberal. They just spend money on different things. The cost of policing the world AND subsidizing businesses and citizens have created a national debt of 9 trillion and rising. We have a spending addiction because we think we can print money whenever we need it. And fighting a nameless, faceless enemy is pretty expensive. It also forces us to get embroiled in a foreign government’s state of affairs so much that the line is blurred as to where their sovereignty begins and our policing ends.
Contrary to our wishes, we’ve set up a Pax Americana, waged with weapons of war upon the world.
As long as our policy remains getting involved in conflicts we have no business being in (either morally or monetarily), we’ll continue to shoulder the blame for the problems of the world.
And no matter the candidate that gets elected next November, they’ll be forced into a policy that deep down we can’t live without. We won’t allow our president to be “soft on terrorism” and we’ll demand that whoever our enemy is at the time, they must be brought to justice. The Axis of Evil will still be there in November and if left un-checked our very way of life, our own survival, will be at risk. We can’t sit idly by.
After all, it’s the american way.

“Jiminy!” -- Sherence Edwin, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development





